Sociology Essay 论文代写: 引发社会暴力的媒体暴力
上述统计数据应该立即表明，媒体暴力对年轻人的头脑的负面影响，不能帮助，但是实质性的，可能会导致社会暴力的一部分，这些暴露。然而，事实是，即使研究几十年，仍然是一个争论的媒体暴力大大有助于社会暴力（豪根·马瑟，2008）。
对正在进行的辩论提供上下文，先定义两个关键术语在本文中讨论的，即“媒体暴力和社会暴力。”值得注意的是由北境、沃利斯和Weingast（2009），“社会暴力”技术是指从事暴力活动的人作为一个群体。这将包括与暴乱、革命和帮派战争有关的暴力事件。然而，对于这篇文章的目的，术语定义为更广泛的行为，是积极的和/或滥用，这导致，或有可能导致，某种形式的伤害一个或多个其他人。这是大多数现有的媒体暴力和社会暴力研究的定义。
Haugen和马瑟（2008）注意，有不同的意见，这正是“媒体暴力，但它通常是指由不同形式的电子媒体如电视节目或电影，电脑游戏和电影的不同层次提出了暴力。这个层次是在媒体暴力的领域可以从研究性学习与研究性学习。然而，作者认为，一个很好的协议，几十年来，媒体暴力和社会暴力的争论更多的是政治上的，而不是科学的。
具体而言，海于根和马瑟（2008）的状态，有两所学校的社会政治思想是不是现实生活中的暴力-----媒体暴力的真正原因，这些都是试图利用媒体暴力研究推进他们的特定的视角。一个学派认为媒体暴力是社会暴力的一个流派，并想对某些内容进行审查以保护儿童。另一方的审查，即使相对薄弱的范围内，作为一个滑的斜坡越来越多的审查不仅是暴力，但许多其他类型的社会表达。在评估现有的研究时，要记住这一想法是很重要的。
可以指出的是，本文的中心论点是，有媒体暴力和社会暴力之间的实质关系，证据充分；然而，社会暴力是多因果关系和媒体暴力可能发挥最大作用，如果额外的因果因素是手术。本文的支持，在本文中，通过广泛的审查现有的媒体暴力的研究表明暴露在反社会的行为和侵略的参与。
Sociology Essay 论文代写: 引发社会暴力的媒体暴力
The above statistics alone should immediately indicate that the negative effects of media violence on the minds of young people cannot help but be substantial, and may in fact lead to social violence on the part of those exposed. However, the fact is that even after decades of ongoing research, there remains a debate as to whether media violence substantially contributes to social violence (Haugen & Musser, 2008).
To provide context to the ongoing debate, it is helpful to first define the two key terms discussed in this essay, namely 'media violence' and 'social violence.' As noted by North, Wallis and Weingast (2009), the term 'social violence' technically refers to violent activities engaged in by people as a group. This would include violence associated with riots, revolutions, and gang warfare. However, for the purposes of this essay, the term is defined far more broadly as behavior that is aggressive and/or abusive and which results in, or has the potential to result in, some form of injury to one or more others. This is the definition used in most of the existing studies of media violence and social violence.
Haugen and Musser (2008) note that there are differing views as to what precisely is meant by the term 'media violence,' but that typically it refers to various gradations of violence presented by differing forms of electronic or film media such as television programs, computer games, and movies. The gradations considered to be within the domain of media violence can and do differ from research study to research study. However, the authors inform that a good deal of the decades long debate over media violence and social violence is more political than scientific.
Specifically, Haugen and Musser (2008) state that there are two schools of sociopolitical thought as to whether or not media violence actually causes real-life violence-----and these are both trying to use research on media violence to advance their particular perspective. One school of thought blames media violence for social violence and wants to censor certain content in order to protect children. The other side views censorship, even if relatively weak in scope, as a slippery slope to increasingly levels of censorship not only of violence but many other types of expressions within society. It is important to keep this in mind when evaluating the existing research.
It can be noted here that the central thesis of this paper is that there is sufficient evidence of a substantial relationship between media violence and social violence; however, social violence is multi-causal and media violence is likely to exert maximal effects if additional causal and contributory factors are operative. This thesis is supported in this paper by an extensive review of the existing research on media violence demonstrating exposure to be followed by engagement in antisocial behavior and aggression.
