这项研究的目的是为了解释研究人员认为在学习第二语言和课堂教学中存在的“差异”之间存在的“差距”。这项研究的基本原理概述了如何实现这一差距将提高语言学习的质量，同时促进民主社会的发展，在这个社会中，学习者是独立的个体，他们最终会在课堂中充分利用这些学习机会。研究框架被解释清楚，并且简明扼要。它不仅将语言学习领域的理论基础与以前的研究相比较，而且还在其语境、方法和数据分析、归纳推理和证明方法的合理性等方面进行了综合。它通过调查结果、问卷调查和后续访谈，成功地说服了目标受众。研究的主题涉及社会和心理方面，因此研究人员认为，用他们创造的工具来合并混合的方法将有助于他们成功地获得这项研究的目标。这一理论支持了这项研究的本质，并让它在实现目标方面有了方向感。因为之前使用工具(在其他研究)测量数据收集基于相同的哲学被认为是缺乏经验,研究人员决定不使用相同的工具,因为他们的目的是与本研究尤其是理论研究存在差距的信念和实际的做法。研究人员花了两个月的时间来开发问卷，并把重点放在内容上，以避免重复以前的研究用同样的工具所做的错误。由于时间的限制，他们决定采访挑选出两个具体问题的教师，他们以关键词来回答。
加拿大麦克马斯特代写论文:解释研究人员
The clarity of the aim of the study was seen in six research questions drawn in order to explain the 'gap' the researchers believed that existed between the beliefs of learner autonomy in learning a second language and its practices inside the classroom. The rationale in this study outlines how achieving this gap would improve the quality of language learning while promoting democratic societies where the learners are independent individuals who would eventually make the best use of these learning opportunities in and out of the classroom. The study framework is explained and displayed in clarity and it is concise. It not only compares in its literature the rationale of the aspects in the language learning world with previous studies, but also manages to synthesize it in its context, methodology and data analysis, drawing inference and justifying their methods. It manages to convince the target audience of the rationale through its findings, the questionnaires and the follow up interviews.The topic of the research engages both social and psychological aspects, thus the researchers believed that to incorporate mixed methods using an instrument that they had created would help them in successfully acquiring the aim of the study. The rationale supported the nature of the research and gave it a sense of direction in achieving its objectives. Since previously used instruments (in other research studies) in measuring data collection based on the same philosophy were considered to be lacking of empiricism, the researchers decided on not using the same instruments because they turned out to be unrelated to the purpose of this research especially to study the existence of a gap between theoretical beliefs and the actual practices. The researchers invested two months in developing the questionnaires and placed more emphasis on content in order to avoid repeating the flaws that previous research studies undertook using the same instruments. Due to time constraints, they decided to interview selected teachers who answered two specific questions by citing keywords.
