加拿大心理学代写:青少年法院

4年前 198次浏览 加拿大心理学代写:青少年法院已关闭评论

法院应该意识到,有研究(Otto & Borum, 2018)强调了一个事实,即青少年法院的历史已经改变,部分原因是对青少年发展阶段的正式和科学的认识,这是一个持续的过程。然而,尽管年轻人的认知能力更强,他们却被认为不如成年人。因此,研究与青少年犯罪相关的风险因素的一个好方法是研究教育和青少年犯罪之间的因果关系。根据研究(Chung, Taylor & Taggart, 2018),这种联系被认为是非常复杂的。例如,早期在教室里的问题,比如攻击性行为,可能会导致孩子从他们的同龄人和老师那里得到不好的评价。这些因素单独导致青少年犯罪,或者仅仅是青少年最初带到学校的问题行为。尽管人们一直在讨论青少年犯罪的起源,但有明确的证据表明(McCord et al., 2000),某些因素与青少年犯罪有关。

加拿大心理学代写:青少年法院

The court should be aware that there is research (Otto & Borum, 2018), that highlights the fact that the history of juvenile courts has changed in part due to the formal and scientific recognition of the developmental stage of adolescents, which is an ongoing process. However, despite the greater cognitive abilities over there younger counterparts, they are considered not to possess the same capacities as adults. So, to examine the risk factors associated with delinquency a good approach would be to look at the causal link between education and juvenile delinquency. According to research (Chung, Taylor & Taggart, 2018), this link is said to be fundamentally complex. For example, early problems in the classroom like aggressive behavior may lead to a child receiving unfavorable evaluations from their peers and educators. These factors alone lead to delinquency, or just simply the problem behavior that that the juvenile brings to the school in the first place. Despite the ongoing discussions into the origins of delinquency there is clear evidence (McCord et al., 2000), the certain factors connected to juvenile delinquency

这些您可能会感兴趣

筛选出你可能感兴趣的一些文章,让您更加的了解我们。