一种模式是简单地让每个学校支付自己的费用，然后分裂产生的收入。这避免了确定费用分配方法的问题。每个机构决定项目中应包括哪些预算费用。它也可以避免成本的问题，在一个位置或多或少比其他。一个缺点可能是，该模型依赖于每个公平地支持运营费用。如果合作是在线的，可能需要一些公式的在线生产和托管的课程。分享收入也有优点和缺点。它认为，学生的每一个合作伙伴招募的数量有一定的股权；否则，它可能是一个学校比其他的贡献。二模型，还有各个学校的预算自己的开支，但各学校保持它产生的收入通过自己的招聘工作。这种模式可能包括每所学校补偿其他当学生从其他学校的课程。或者每个学校只保留它产生的收入。这种模式的优点是，它是明确的，每所学校是单独的风险。缺点是，假设成本是相等的，在大多数情况下，一所学校可能产生更多的收入比另一个，因此，合作可能是不平衡的。
加拿大语言学代写essay:费用分配方法
One model is to simply have each school pay for its own costs and then split the revenues generated. This avoids the problem of determining methods for allocating expenses. Each institution decides what budgetary expenses should be included in the project. It may also avoid the problem of costs at one location being more or less than the other. One disadvantage may be that the model relies on each to equitably support the operational expenses. If the collaboration is online there probably needs to be some formula for the online production and hosting of the courses. Sharing the revenues also has advantages and disadvantages. It does assume that there is some equity in the numbers of students recruited by each partner; otherwise, it is possible one school is contributing more than the other.A second model is to still have each school budget its own expenses, but have each school keep the revenues it generates through its own recruiting efforts. This model might include each school compensating the other when a student takes a course(s) from the other school. Or each school simply keeps the revenue it generates. The advantage to this model is that it is clear and each school is separately at risk. The disadvantage is that assuming costs are equal in most cases, one school may generate more revenue than the other one and therefore the partnership might be uneven.
